iGeneTech Bioscience Co., Ltd.
EN

Cross-oncopanel study reveals high sensitivity and accuracy with overall analytical performance depending on genomic regions

Binsheng Gong; Dan Li; Rebecca Kusko; Natalia Novoradovskaya; Yifan Zhang; Shangzi Wang; Carlos Pabón-Peña; Zhihong Zhang; Kevin Lai; Wanshi Cai; Jennifer S. LoCoco; Eric Lader; Todd A. Richmond; Vinay K. Mittal; Liang-Chun Liu; Donald J. Johann; James C. Willey; Pierre R. Bushel; Ying Yu; Chang Xu; Guangchun Chen; Daniel Burgess; Simon Cawley; Kristina Giorda; Nathan Haseley; Fujun Qiu; Katherine Wilkins; Hanane Arib; Claire Attwooll; Kevin Babson; Longlong Bao; Wenjun Bao; Anne Bergstrom Lucas; Hunter Best; Ambica Bhandari; Halil Bisgin; James Blackburn; Thomas M. Blomquist; Lisa Boardman; Blake Burgher; Daniel J. Butler; Chia-Jung Chang; Alka Chaubey; Tao Chen; Marco Chierici; Christopher R. Chin; Devin Close; Jeffrey Conroy; Jessica Cooley Coleman; Daniel J. Craig; Erin Crawford; Angela del Pozo; Ira W. Deveson; Daniel Duncan; Agda Karina Eterovic; Xiaohui Fan; Jonathan Foox; Cesare Furlanello; Abhisek Ghosal; Sean Glenn; Meijian Guan; Christine Haag; Xinyi Hang; Scott Happe; Britt
Genome Biology 2021;22(1):109 DOI:10.1186/s13059-021-02315-0
Read More

Background:
Targeted sequencing using oncopanels requires comprehensive assessments of accuracy and detection sensitivity to ensure analytical validity. By employing reference materials characterized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-led SEquence Quality Control project phase2 (SEQC2) effort, we perform a cross-platform multi-lab evaluation of eight Pan-Cancer panels to assess best practices for oncopanel sequencing.

Results:
All panels demonstrate high sensitivity across targeted high-confidence coding regions and variant types for the variants previously verified to have variant allele frequency (VAF) in the 5–20% range. Sensitivity is reduced by utilizing VAF thresholds due to inherent variability in VAF measurements. Enforcing a VAF threshold for reporting has a positive impact on reducing false positive calls. Importantly, the false positive rate is found to be significantly higher outside the high-confidence coding regions, resulting in lower reproducibility. Thus, region restriction and VAF thresholds lead to low relative technical variability in estimating promising biomarkers and tumor mutational burden.

Conclusion:
This comprehensive study provides actionable guidelines for oncopanel sequencing and clear evidence that supports a simplified approach to assess the analytical performance of oncopanels. It will facilitate the rapid implementation, validation, and quality control of oncopanels in clinical use.